Relative dating methods and absolute dating methods erin karpluk dating

15 Jul

A single observation which proves beyond doubt that the earth has been in existence for less than, say, 1 billion years would greatly weaken the arguments in favor of evolution.There simply would not have been sufficient time for all of the natural geological and biological processes to produce the complexities of the present world.A second belief is that, unless otherwise indicated, biblical passages should be interpreted literally.Thus, when the Genesis creation story or stories state that God created the world in six days, it is normally interpreted to mean six literal, 24 hour, days.When their estimates agree, their belief in the accuracy of both estimates improves.So too does the credibility of their initial assumption of the relative constancy of certain fundamental factors of nature.It is impossible to prove that the theory of evolution is absolutely true.

Species of life have evolved and died out over billions of years, leaving behind fossils in rock layers which demonstrate the gradual development of simple forms of life into more complex forms.

By finding consistent agreement among many diverse pairs of measurements which are made with unrelated methods, scientists have built up confidence in the measurements themselves, and the stability of various factors in the universe. On the surface, the coral measurements would seem to be conclusive proof that the corals were alive hundreds of millions of years ago. A creation scientist could legitimately ask the question: what if the rate of radioactive decay was a few hundred thousand times faster in 4000 BCE that it is today.

And what if the earth's deceleration rate was also a few hundred thousand times greater at the time of Adam and Eve.

Consider two methods of estimating the age of some fossils which gave the same approximate result: The agreement of these two figures gives scientists a degree of confidence that the rate of slowing of the earth's rotation is constant, that the rate of radioactive decay is constant, that radiometric techniques to estimate the age of rocks is valid, and that the rugose corals are about 375 million years old.

Consider two methods of estimating the age of the moon which also produced near identical results: Again, the agreement of these two measurements gives scientists confidence that the rate of accumulation of space dust has been more or less constant, that the radioisotope method of dating rocks works, and that the moon is about four billion years old.